TL;DR
Get oils, diffusers and self-care delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Home-based care and skilled nursing leaders say signing a Medicare Advantage contract is only the start of a payer relationship. At a June PAYER Summit, speakers pointed to regular communication, timely provider data, episode-based care management and clinical input as ways to address problems and work toward shared goals.
Home-based care and skilled nursing leaders said providers need to do more than sign Medicare Advantage contracts to remain effective participants in payer networks: they must communicate regularly, share performance data and address operational issues with health plans. Speakers at the PAYER Summit in June described those practices as ways to build ongoing working relationships and pursue shared care goals.
Chris Cycak-Dyos, director of strategic network operations at healthcare technology and services provider Helion, said some providers stop communicating with a payer after securing a contract. That can leave issues unaddressed, he said. He advised providers to manage the full episode of care, rather than focusing only on individual visits, and to bring their own data to payer discussions.
Cycak-Dyos said payers and providers both face challenges getting timely, high-quality information, and that claims data can lag by six months. Providers can still establish a baseline for their operations and patient outcomes, he said, then use that information to discuss performance with health plans. He said providers that understand and present their own data can distinguish themselves in those conversations.
Matt Lippitt, Bayada Home Health Care’s vice president and division director, said data sharing and agreement on expectations are part of the beginning of a payer relationship. He said health plans look for quality improvement, dependable access and reliability, and that data helps Bayada track whether it is meeting shared goals. Cycak-Dyos also recommended involving clinical and other frontline teams in contract discussions so staff understand requirements before problems appear as claim denials.
Turning Contracts Into Working Relationships
The speakers’ advice points to an operational challenge for providers: a signed agreement does not by itself settle how care will be delivered, measured or corrected when difficulties arise. Ongoing communication gives both sides a channel to raise concerns, while shared expectations and provider performance information can make it easier to identify gaps and discuss responses.
For patients and plan members, episode-based care management may help providers coordinate around a broader course of treatment instead of treating each visit as an isolated event, Cycak-Dyos said. The source report does not provide outcome data showing that this approach improves patient results. Its significance here is that providers and payers are being encouraged to align their work around care and performance goals, not merely contract terms.
home health care provider data management tools
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Summit Speakers Recommended
The discussion brought together perspectives from organizations with different roles in care delivery. Pittsburgh-based Helion provides technology, data and reporting services, along with consulting, to support home- and community-based care. Bayada, founded in 1975, provides home health and other services across 20 states. Ignite Medical Resorts operates skilled nursing, rehabilitation and other services across seven states.
Justin Meara, Ignite’s senior vice president of managed care, described a case in which one of the company’s Texas facilities experienced friction with a payer. Ignite arranged weekly meetings with senior leaders to hear the payer’s concerns, Meara said. He presented the meetings as a way to show leadership involvement and a willingness to work toward common goals. The report does not identify the payer or detail the dispute.
“I often see providers, they get that contract, and then there’s no communication back and forth between the two sides. I think that’s where providers often fail.”
— Chris Cycak-Dyos, director of strategic network operations at Helion
What the Report Does Not Establish
The source report describes recommendations and examples shared by industry leaders, not a study comparing contract outcomes. It does not quantify whether the practices discussed lead to better patient outcomes, fewer denials, stronger contract retention or lower costs. The comments about delayed claims data and payer priorities are attributed to the speakers; the report does not supply independent measurements or detail how widely those conditions apply.
The Texas facility example also lacks details about the underlying disagreement, how long the weekly meetings continued or whether the payer relationship changed as a result. The speakers did not describe specific contract provisions or a standard set of performance measures that all providers and plans use.
Providers’ Next Steps With Payers
The speakers’ recommendations focus on work providers can take into future payer discussions: establish baseline measures, clarify expectations, involve clinical teams in reviewing contract requirements and maintain regular contact after signing. Where claims information is delayed, providers may need to use operational and outcome data they already collect to explain performance, while recognizing that the report does not set out a single required data standard.
For the Ignite example, the report does not say whether the weekly meetings are continuing or what further action the payer and provider took. More broadly, it remains to be seen how individual plans and care organizations will translate these recommendations into contract terms, reporting routines and measurable results.
Key Questions
What did home-based care leaders say providers need after signing a Medicare Advantage contract?
They cited regular communication, shared performance data and clear expectations, along with continued attention to operational issues and care across an episode.
Why did speakers say providers should bring their own data?
Cycak-Dyos said claims data can be delayed by six months, making providers’ own operational and patient-outcome measures useful for discussing current performance with a payer.
How did Ignite Medical Resorts respond to payer friction?
Justin Meara said Ignite arranged weekly meetings with senior leaders to hear concerns involving one of its Texas facilities. The report does not give the dispute’s details or its outcome.
Does the report show these practices improve patient outcomes?
No. It reports advice and examples from industry leaders but provides no outcome study or comparative results establishing that the practices improve care or contract performance.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
